Home > Campaign updates, Uncategorized > Updated Briefing

Updated Briefing

Here is an updated Briefing Note_SomyotPrueksakasemsuk-FINAL about Somyot and his legal case.

Human rights defender Mr. Somyot Pruksakasemsuk charged under Lèse majesté law
Somyot Pruksakasemsuk, 50, is an editor of Voice of Taksin (translated as
“Voice of the Southerners/ Voice of the Oppressed”) magazine and a prominent
Thai labour rights activist. He is known for his tireless efforts in supporting the
empowerment of the workers movement and the establishment of democratic
trade unionism in Thailand. In 2007, he began to edit the Voice of Taksin
magazine, a publication that covers political issues and analysis.
Somyot is also the chair of the Union of Democratic Labour Alliance and the
leader of the 24th June democracy group. Prior to his arrest, he played an active
role in the campaign to repeal the lèse majesté law (Article 112 of the Criminal
Code). Somyot was detained for 21 days in May – June 2010 under the
Emergency Decree on Public Administration in Emergency Situations.
Somyot was arrested on 30 April 2011 in Aranyaprathet district, Sa Kaeo
Province, and later charged with violating Article 112 of the Thai Criminal Code
which states that “whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen,
the Heir-apparent or the Regent, shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years”. According to the
Public Prosecutor, Somyot is alleged to have allowed the publication of two articles in the Voice of Taksin that
make negative references to the monarchy. The articles were written by Jit Pollachan, a pseudonym made up of
the names of two Thai left-wing thinkers – Jit Pumisak and Asanee Pollachan. If found guilty, he could face a
maximum of 30 years imprisonment.
His arrest came only five days after The Democracy Network, in which Somyot is involved, launched a campaign
to collect 10,000 signatures to petition for a parliamentary review of Section 112 of the Criminal Code.
Previously, his name was included in a chart published by Colonel Sansern Kaewkamnerd, the Center for the
Resolution of Emergency Situations (CRES) spokesperson, on 26 April 2010. The chart contained numerous
names of individuals whom the CRES accused of being ‘anti-monarchy.’ However, no credible evidence has
been presented to substantiate this vague allegation.
Somyot has been arbitrarily detained since 30 April 2011, for a period of 15 uninterrupted months. Requests for
his release on bail have been repeatedly rejected by the court, as is the usual practice with lèse majesté
suspects. The last request was denied on 18 May 2012, the tenth refusal. This is in violation of the constitutional
guarantee of the right to bail under Section 40 (7) of the 2007 Thai Constitution, the right to a fair trial under the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which Thailand ratified in 1996, and Principles 36-
39 of the Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment
(1988). Prolonged pre-trial detention undermines the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, a
universal right protected under the Thai Constitution and the ICCPR; it also affects Somyot’s and his lawyer’s
ability to adequately prepare his defense.
Somyot’s trial started on 21 November and took place in several different provinces of Thailand. For the
hearings involving the witnesses for the prosecution, Somyot was transferred to the provinces of Sa Kaeo (21
November 2011), Petchabun (19 December 2011), Nakorn Sawan (16 January 2011) and Songkla (13 February
2012). The last hearing was postponed at the last minute although Somyot had already travelled there and rescheduled
to take place in Bangkok due to the absence of witnesses. Despite the fact that all prosecution
witnesses work and live in Bangkok, the court ordered the hearings to take place in the provinces based on the
witnesses’ house registration. Such practice has been criticised for hindering the full presence and participation
of trial observers, diplomatic corps as well as journalists and undermined his right to a fair trial.
Somyot suffers from hypertension and gout. Due to the scheduling of hearings in provincial courts between
November 2011 and February 2012, Somyot was transferred from prison to prison and had to stand up in a
crowded truck. His ankles were shackled with a chain weighing 10 kilograms and he was denied access to rest
room facilities during the journey. The total distance travelled under such conditions was 4,000 kilometres
across the country. He is currently detained in the Bangkok Remand Centre, which is also notorious for its
overpopulation and inadequate healthcare. Long-distance transfer and prolonged pre-trial detention aggravate
Somyot’s health conditions, which could worsen if the taking off medicine for hypertension and gout is
The witness hearings were completed on 3 May 2012, but the verdict has not yet been issued. On 24 April 2012,
Somyot’s lawyer submitted a request to the Criminal Court, asking it to request the Constitutional Court to rule
on the constitutionality of Article 112. The Criminal Court did not immediately agree to do so. On 27 April, his
lawyer submitted the request directly to the Constitutional Court, which decided on 18 May to reject this request
on the ground that Somyot had not exhausted other means to exercise his rights, as required by Section 212 of
the Constitution and the Court’s rules. However, on 7 June, the Criminal Court decided to forward his lawyer’s
initial request to the Constitutional Court. On 26 June, the Constitutional Court informed his lawyer that it had
received both requests and also attached its 18 May decision in full. The Criminal Court will not announce the
date of the issuance of the verdict of Somyot’s criminal trial until 19 September 2012, as it will await the decision
of the Constitutional Court on the request forwarded by the Criminal Court.
The UN has raised serious concerns regarding the pre-trial detention of those accused of lese majeste and
more specificlaly regarding Somyot’s case. On 9 December 2011, Ravina Shamdasani, Spokesperson for the
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights stated that the office is “concerned about the extended periods that
accused persons [under lese majeste law] are being held in pre-trial detention”.
On 20 December 2011, El Hadji Malick Sow, Chair-Rapporteur of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention;
Gabriela Knaul, UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers; Frank La Rue, UN Special
Rapportuer on the promotion and protection of the rights of freedom of opinion and expression; and Margaret
Sekkagya, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders wrote a joint letter of allegation to
the Thai government raising concerns about the physical and psychological integrity of Somyot and that his
detention may be related to his human rights work and his legitimate exercise of his right to freedom of opinion
and expression.
Somyot was one of the five human rights defenders shortlisted for the Somchai Neelaphaijit Award for
outstanding human rights work in July 2012. The award, which was given out by the Somchai Neelaphaijit
Memorial Fund, aims to honour human rights defenders who have fought to protect human rights bravely and
vigorously, and who have at times put themselves in danger to defend human rights like the disappeared human
rights lawyer Somchai Neelaphaijit.
Last updated: 28 August 2012

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: